Thursday, January 29, 2015

Epiphanies

A motif that appears throughout Portrait is that of Stephan's many epiphanies. At the end of every chapter, Stephen makes some earth-shattering realization or decision that he imagines will change his life forever. Mr. Mitchell has asked us to listen to the music of the words, and at these climactic moments, the music crescendos beautifully and exultantly into what sounds like a resolution of all problems faced in the chapter. First Stephen accepts being alone, and is happy with it. Then he finally has sex, ending his rampant imagination's reign over his thoughts. Next he repents, and rejoices in that he is forgiven, and he sees beauty everywhere and feels serene in his piety. After that, he hallucinates (?) and discovers his vocation for the arts.
After all of these epiphanies, Stephen's perception of his life gets flipped-turned upside down, and our perception of him and his life cannot help but change as well. It is unclear if his life actually changes that much though, and with Joyce laying on the irony pretty thick in some cases, it is easy to doubt the validity of some of Stephen's epiphanies. The question that remains is whether his apparently ground-breaking realizations are actually meaningful. I have to say yes, these epiphanies are significant. Firstly, I really relate to Stephen is this, because I am wont to have "epiphanies" or at least overly dramatize my realizations--at one point I had two epiphanies within an hour, and the second epiphany was just "hey remember that epiphany you had an hour ago, yeah that was wrong"--so I sympathize with Stephen's perceptions changing dramatically and rapidly. I also think that, while some of his may not appear to change Stephen's life (as seen by Joyce's undermining them at the start of the following chapter), they do change how he perceives his life. These altered perceptions also change Stephen's actions, which is probably just as important.
At the beginning of the semester, I defined coming-of-age to loosely be when you know what you want to do with your life, and you do do it. That is to say, you know yourself, and you act on that knowledge. Stephen's epiphanies are how he knows himself:  each one gives him deeper insight into who he is, at least at that point in time. The chapters end on such a high note because Stephen is halfway to coming of age. Joyce starts each chapter by showing that Stephen doesn't act on his epiphanies much, proving that he has not yet fully come of age. While each epiphany helps Stephen develop, it is not until he knows himself well enough to change his life accordingly that he actually comes of age. At the end of chapter three, I would say that Stephen comes of age, because he has the epiphany (that he is going to go to hell) and he acts on it (confesses). I do not think that the factuality of his epiphanies matters so much as his believing in them, and his acting on them. However, I think that, since Stephen only returns what he is supposed to be doing at the end of chapter three, he does not completely come of age, because he does not choose his own path. At the end of chapter four, Stephen has another epiphany, and he again acts on it, this time discovering his vocation for the arts and choosing to attend University. So Stephen comes of age again, but this time more so, because he left the beaten path and actually thoughtfully chose his own fate. I have not yet read the last few pages of the book, so I cannot speak on whether or not Stephen is fully of age at the end or not (probably not) but I do think that he is no longer a child once he goes to University. Pretentious adult, maybe. But not a child.

Also I am thinking of writing about this topic for a Reflective Response Paper, so any feedback/critiquing of what I am saying would be much appreciated.

2 comments:

  1. It's funny because as I was reading this I thought that this would be an amazing topic for a reflective response paper!

    I find your point on the epiphany in Chapter 3 being the coming-of-age very interesting. I never really thought of Stephen's coming-of-age to be acting on knowledge of the epiphany, but I think it makes sense. I would argue, though, that the epiphany at the end of Chapter Four might be the greatest and most significant of them all. Yes, he follows through the Chapter 3 epiphany, but I feel he goes to a greater extent and different level with the Chapter 4 epiphany. In Chapter 5, he basically severs the relationship with his mother in order to follow through with what he believes in. In comparison, the Chapter 3 epiphany only impacts Stephen, while the Chapter 4 epiphany impacts everyone around him. Letting go of one's god and religion, basically everything he knew and was taught as a young child, is one of the most powerful decisions that a person can make in my opinion. The self-reflection leading up to that decision is beyond anything that I can fathom.
    On a different note, your perception of coming-of-age ("...you know yourself, and you act on that knowledge") is very accurate in my opinion. This might sound trivial, but the daily decision, such as ordering food or deciding how to spend your time, all point to a certain maturity depending on how you decide. Knowing yourself and TRUSTING yourself to make the right decision, be it big or small, points to a bigger picture for sure.



    ReplyDelete
  2. The whole idea of "verifying" an epiphany is pretty complicated--akin to my (trick) question in class the other day about whether the "bird girl" is "actually" a symbol or not. She's *not* "actually" a symbol, like in the universe or whatever, but she is insofar as Stephen makes her one. The perception of a symbol is entirely subjective, and could easily be overlooked--you may have strolled blithely by a whole host of potentially symbolic comments on your current state this morning on the way to school, and if you were too sleepy to notice, they wouldn't "count" as symbols.

    It's similar with epiphanies: they represent an *experience* of sudden insight, of things falling into place, and indeed they can be "false" or delusional. Is Stephen "really" seeing the figure in the sky, or hallucinating? How can he "confirm" that it represents a prophecy and isn't just some weird bird?

    The answer, of course, is that he can't--he can only choose to embrace it *as* a symbol, a sanctification of his newfound sense of mission. But the meaning--as with the meaning of everything in this novel, at some level--is located in Stephen, and not outside in the world.

    ReplyDelete